Group
Function Description
The Group function combines any objects (geometries of the same or different types) in the current layer into a compound.
- The group operation on objects of the same or different types generates a new compound. Objects of the same type in line and polygon layers can be grouped. Objects of different types in CAD composite layers can be grouped.
- In the attributes of the newly generated compound, system fields (except SmUserID) are assigned by the system. The SmUserID field and non-system fields inherit the corresponding information from the object with the smallest SmID value among the objects participating in the group.
- Supports grouping geometries across layers.
- In point datasets, grouping point objects is not supported.
- When the number of overlapping surfaces of objects is even, this area appears white after grouping and is part of the result data.
Function Entry
- Edit Data tab -> Feature Editing group -> General editing -> Group and Ungroup -> Group
- In the map -> context menu -> Group button.
Operation Instructions
- With the layer editable, select two or multiple objects.
- In the Edit Data tab, under the General editing drop-down menu, click the Group button in the Group and Ungroup group to group the selected objects.
Or perform the following operations:
Select the two objects to be merged, right-click, and choose the Group command from the context menu.
Difference Between Group and Merge
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Original Objects | CAD Layer Group Result | Polygon Layer Group Result | Union Result |
- Merge can only operate on objects of the same type, while Group can operate on objects of different types.
- Merge cannot operate on point objects, while Group can operate on text objects and point objects in CAD.
Notes:- After performing a group operation in a polygon layer, the overlapping areas of polygon objects appear white, which is part of the result and not missing.
- When polygon objects being grouped have inclusion relationships, they are treated as donut polygons, and the result is consistent with that of donut polygons.
Related Topics


